Abstract
The objective of this research was to model the cometary plasma environment in order
to prepare for the Comet Interceptor mission. In other words, the main goal was to determine
the outermost plasma boundary to be encountered by Comet Interceptor, i.e. the bow shock,
to know the scale size of potential comet targets. The bow shock is the boundary formed
where the solar wind first meets the comet. We determine the bow shock stand-off distance
potential Comet Interceptor mission targets, if the spacecraft had already been launched.
These comets were specifically selected by the project team because they were reachable
within the mission's operational lifetime, if it had been already launched.
The study investigated the relationships between tree boundary distances (bow shock,
diamagnetic cavity and exobase), heliocentric distance, and outgassing rates of the comets.
Furthermore, the Rosetta spacecraft's trajectory has been studied in relation to the bow shock
location of its target 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, in order to determine potential
interactions with the comet's bow shock boundary. We also modelled theses locations for
comet Hale Bopp to get an upper limit to the scale size of potential targets.
The stand-off distance of each comet's bow shock was determined using the model
developed by Koenders et al. (2013) after having first scaled the model parameters
(outgassing rate, ionisation rate, Solar wind parameters) by heliocentric distance. For the
diamagnetic cavity, the Cravens et al. (1986) model was used while the Henri et al. (2016)
model was applied in order to calculate the exobase location.
For comet 67P and the selected dataset, our results clearly show that the bow shock stand-off
distance relies on the heliocentric distance. Beyond about 2 AU, the bow shock did not form
at all for 67P. For Hale-Bopp, the bock shock was much larger and reached a few times 106
km at a heliocentric distance at 4 AU. Furthermore, we could also study how the stand-off
distance increased with the comet's outgassing rate. Regarding the diamagnetic cavity, they
have approximatively the same size (around 100 km at 1 AU) as the exobase for the
selected dataset of comets according to the models used, while Rosetta observed a difference with a factor 10 between the size of
the diamagnetic cavity (≃100 km at perihelion) and the exobase (≃10 km at perihelion) at comet 67P.
Results
Final report
The Comet Interceptor mother spacecraft, carrying two IRF instruments probes providing the in situ plasma density measurements prepared in this work, with its two daughter spacecraft in the background, heading towards the target comet. [Image credit: ESA]